![]() |
|
|
|
Food for ThoughtWeek 9: Tuesday, March 22 "The people" had tried and failed to forge unified nation-states in 1848. In 1859 and the throughout the 1860s, it was the turn of existing liberal or conservative governments to take the initiative in dealing with the issue. How did the plans of these governments differ from the plans of the revolutionaries in 1848? How did these governments "solve" the national problem on their own terms? What were the shortcomings of these solutions? As you do the readings, a trip to the gallery would not hurt. You are responsible for reading everything, but you are only responsible for answering the questions associated with you name below. German Unification and the Austrian Ausgleich (Agostinho to McDonald) A note on the "dual policy" to which Bismarck refers: At the beginning of Bismarck's diplomatic career, Austria and Prussia had joined in a "dual policy" whereby the two states cooperated on German issues, with the former acting as the senior partner. The Austrians had confirmed Prussian subordination in negotiations at Olmutz in 1850, when they had forced Prussia to back down in the face of various threats. The Ausgleich refers to the constitutional reforms undertaken by the Austrian Empire in 1867. Austria went from being a unitary empire dominated solely by the Germans to a "dual monarchy" (Austria-Hungary) in which the Germans and Hungarians became more or less equal partners, ruling over the other ethnic minorities of the empire (Hungary essentially obtained semi-autonomy). Count von Beust was the Austrian statesman (he was of Saxon origin) who was responsible for adopting this policy. The reading by Beust describes what he sought to accomplish with this reform.
Piedmont, Cavour, and the Italian Wars of Unification (McKeon to Tombeno)
|
||
For
questions, comments, or suggestions about this website, please contact the webmaster.
Copyrighted by Hugh Dubrulle, 2005.