Methods


 
Participants
There were fourteen undergraduate students who participated in this experiment taken from a Northern, private, liberal arts, Catholic college (five males, nine females). The participants were obtained through a poster sign-up located in the Psychology department of the college with a brief description of what was required of each participant. Informed consent was obtained from each participant prior to the study, briefly stating the rules and expectations of each participant (see Appendix A). Each participant was also debriefed after the completion of the study (see Appendix B). Each participant was required to exercise for twenty minutes, preferably in exercise attire and sneakers. The participants were also asked to complete two questionnaires at the end of the workout (the Profile of Mood States and the Borg Scale of Perceived Exertion). The participants were between the ages of eighteen and twenty one years old. This study followed the ethical guidelines set forth by the college as well as the ethical guidelines written under the American Psychological Association ethical standards.

Design
This experiment utilized a three-group design. Dependent measures in this study consisted of mean heart rate, mean distance ran, self-reported perceived exertion, and mood scale (comparing tension, depression, anger, vigor, fatigue, confusion, and friendliness). The independent between group variables were the three different conditions of music being played (fast, slow, or none). The within subject variable was the type of music each participant listened to while running. An analysis of variance was used to examine the results of all these variables. The study was designed to investigate if there were any significant differences between the groups and to measure any relationships between the music, self-reported perceived exertion, mood enhancement, distance ran, and/or heart rate. The design examined whether the different types of music had a significant role during exercise.

Materials
Music

The experiment contained three different conditions or groups of background music: a fast tempo, a slow tempo, and no music. The music was provided by the Top 40.charts.com, which consists of the most popular songs based on web traffic and the Top 40 chart.com, which is comprised due to air play and record sales (updated weekly). The first independent group of music used had an upbeat, fast tempo and was taken from the Music Billboard Top Forty weekly songs based on sale records. The songs taken from the Top Forty weekly chart were songs categorized with a fast beat, mainly hip-hop. The reason for using the top forty weekly songs was so each participant would be familiar with the songs playing during the workout since they were the most popular at the time. The second independent group of music used was again from the Music Billboards Top Forty weekly songs, but had a more contemporary, slow rhythm. The second group of music was slowed paced to provide a significant decrease in the tempo between the first independent group of music and the second. The third and last condition played no music in order to obtain a baseline. These three conditions were selected in order to ensure that there was a considerable difference between the beat and tempo of each selection of music that was played throughout the experiment. 

CD
The fast tempo CD included five songs. The order of the songs was determined by using the highest selling and most air-played song on the weekly countdown and then preceding down from there (Top 40.charts.com). The songs included: Baby Boy, by Beyonce Knowles featuring Sean Paul, Shake ya Tailfeather, by Nelly, featuring P. Diddy and Murphy Lee, Crazy in Love, by Beyonce Knowles featuring Jay Z, Bring Me to Life, by Evanescence, and Get Low, by Lil John and East Side Boyz. The slow CD (again starting with the highest selling and most air time) consisted of Here Without You, by 3 Doors Down, Into You, by Fabulous, Someday, by Nickelback, Unwell, by Matchbox Twenty, Calling all Angels, by Train, and So Far Away, by Stained. The CD was made by the experimenter on a Dell Notebook computer. The CD's were marked accordingly and each participant only listened to the specific music designated for him or her (random assignment prior to the start of the experiment) from the burned CD.

CD Player
The CD was played on a portable CD player. This portable CD player was purchased in August, 2003. The volume level reaches 12 and can only hold one CD at a time. It requires six C batteries or can be plugged into an electrical outlet. It has FM/AM radio, a tape deck, and a CD holder. The volume was set on three and a half so the music could be heard, but was not overpowering and was consistent for each participant despite the type of music playing.

Profile of Mood States and The Borg Scale of Perceived Exertion

Each participant was also required to complete the POMS mood scale (Profile of Mood States) following his or her exercise for the purpose of acquiring the mood of each participant directly after exercise. The Profile of Mood States is a 65 item, Likert-type questionnaire. Subscales of the POMS include depression, anger, tension, fatigue, vigor, confusion, and friendliness. The internal consistency of the POMS ranges from .84 to .95, while test-retest reliability coefficients range from .65 to .74 (Hansen, Stevens & Coast, 2001). After completing the POMS mood scale, each participant was then given the Borg Scale of Perceived Exertion (see Appendix B). The Borg Scale of Perceived Exertion rated the amount of self-reported perceived exertion from a scale of six to twenty (six being the lowest amount exerted). It is a tool to estimate the perceived exertion, breathlessness, and fatigue during exercise (Borg, 140). This scale was used in many of the studies previously described in the literature and is rated to be reliable and valid. The obtained validity correlation is around .85 (Borg, 1998), while the average mean for re-test reliability is between .83 and .90. The participants were asked to rate how hard they perceived the exercise based on this scale from six to twenty.

Apparatus
Elliptical Machine

Each Participant was required to run on the elliptical machine within the laboratory of the Psychology Department of Saint Anselm College. The elliptical machine was purchased from Scifit equipment (Scientific Solutions for Fitness) on May 6, 2003 from the Precision Fitness Equipment store in Natick, MA. The cost of the machine was three thousand five hundred and ninety five dollars. The elliptical machine used was an SXT7000 series and included features such as, a cordless model to increase versatility and for expediency, a contact heart rate, which allowed monitoring of heart rate throughout the workout, and a bi-directional installment, which enabled each participant to reverse direction when running (however no participant did so). It was equipped with large handles for correct body positioning while exercising and the speed of the elliptical machine was dependent on how fast the user was pedaling (http://www.scifit.com). 

Polar Heart Rate Monitor
The participants were also asked to wear a polar heart rate monitor. The purpose of the polar heart monitor was to record an accurate heart rate every minute for twenty minutes. It was specifically designed for beginner exercisers to record their heart rate during exercise. There were two parts to this device. The first part was the elastic strap. This was placed on each participant, prior to running, underneath the chest muscles. The polar heart rate monitor strap, a wireless ECG accurate that coded transmissions for heart rate, was worn during exercise in order to obtain accurate measurements of the physiological effects occurring during the exercise. The second part was a watch that read the heart rate (the experimenter only need to press one button and it started recording heart rate), as well as the elliptical machine, which also picked up the polar heart rate and visibly showed the heart rate on its monitor 
(Polar.com). The polar heart rate was purchased by the Psychology Department in May, 2002.

Procedure
The sign-up sheet for this experiment was posted in the psychology department by October 9, 2003 for participants to sign up for the experiment during the weeks of October 13, 2003 and October 20, 2003. Prior to the start of the experiment, the music was counterbalanced for the order in which the music conditions were presented. This was done to control for the order in each category of music was listened to. The participants were randomly assigned to one of the three different music groups (fast, slow, or none) . The random assignment took place prior to the start of the experiment. The time of day in which each participant exercised was also held constant in all of the conditions.

The fourteen different participants came to run on the elliptical machine for twenty minutes in the laboratory of the Saint Anselm College Psychology Department. It was necessary for each participant to dress appropriately in exercise clothing, or the clothing he or she felt most comfortable to perspire in (sneakers were preferred). Prior to the beginning of the experiment, each participant was asked to sign an informed consent form (see Appendix A) and was told that if at any time he or she felt dizzy or faint, to stop exercising. Also, before each participant arrived, the CD was already in the portable CD player so the participant would not notice the CD player (located behind the elliptical machine in the corner). The music was then turned on and off by the investigator at the beginning and end of each workout.

After the participants signed the informed consent, the participants were asked to put on the polar heart rate monitor underneath their shirt, beneath their chest bone (the experimenter left the room until the polar heart rate monitor was on). Once they placed the polar heart rate monitor on, the participant stepped on the elliptical machine to start the exercise (this is when the CD would be turned on). Each participant was expected to complete a twenty-minute workout. During the twenty-minute workout, the experimenter was responsible to check for heart rate and distance ran every minute. The reason for monitoring heart rate and distance was to examine any differences or similarities noted between the different types of music each the participant was listening to.

Once each participant had completed the twenty minutes of exercise (the experimenter would turn off the music at this point), he or she was asked to complete the POMS mood scale, which examines seven different subscales of moods (tension, depression, anger, vigor, fatigue, confusion, and friendliness). After completing the POMS mood scale, he or she was then asked to respond to the Borg Scale of Perceived Exertion (see Appendix C). There were six questions added to the scale concerning the music listened to during the workout. Specifically, the questions were added to investigate if any participants were aware of the music or if any participants perceived the music as enhancing the workout (see Appendix C). Also, information was obtained to acknowledge how much regular exercise each participant engages in. While completing both the POMS and Perceived Exertion Scale, each participant sat at a desk in the laboratory room. Once the participant finished answering both questionnaires, he or she received a debriefing statement (see Appendix B) and was thanked by the experimenter.