The Effectiveness of Social Skills Training (SST) for Children:
A Pilot Study

Meghan M. Dwyer

social skills training (SST); social skills and children

Related Links


    I would like to thank all those who have helped me through my thesis.  First, I would like to thank my supporting family who continued to ask and encourage me about my thesis.  To all of my friends, especially Shells, my roommates Kate, Ronnie, and Liz, and my psychology buddies Bianca and Hannah, thanks for your support and enthusiasm.  Without the help of my psychology professors, I would never have understood the value of research and scientific inquiry.  Thank you to Professor Troisi and Profossor Ossoff, without your help I would not have known how to write a thesis.
    A special thank you to Dr. Monarch who gave me the opportunity to work in a clinical setting and to use the children as the participants in this experiment.  Dr. Monarch deserves special thanks for helping me through the different stages of the thesis, from the research question to the final editing. My co-workers Lea Lockwood and Colette Salvas deserve recognition for their guidance through the process as well.  I have enjoyed each stage of this journey.  Thank you for all of your support.


  Socially disadvantaged children have higher rates of psychological maladjustment, including anxiety and mood disorders.  However, social skills training (SST) effectiveness studies rarely investigate psychological adjustment.  Prior to participation and following completion of a SST program, socially disadvantaged children (n=12) and their parents completed questionnaires regarding the participants’ psychological adjustment. The SST program included 12 hours of intensive verbal and nonverbal communication training.  Results indicated significant decreases in psychological distress including less anxiety and depression.  The findings suggest that SST may improve the psychological well-being of socially-rejected children.
back to top


    Many children and adolescents experience interpersonal difficulties throughout development.  Those with additional challenges such as learning, behavioral, or emotional disabilities, or ADHD, depression, or anxiety are at a particular disadvantage in terms of gaining social competence.  The literature suggests that such children display fewer positive social behaviors, lower rates of reinforcement and cooperation with peers, and less initiative interacting with peers.  Even in the absence of disabilities, however, some children are socially rejected.  Socially disadvantaged children have higher rates of anxiety and mood disorders, loneliness, delinquency, aggression, and academic underachievement.  Unfortunately, early social problems often endure through the lifespan and in adulthood can lead to higher rates of job unemployment, more marital conflicts and even higher risk of suicide (Bagwell, Molina, Pelham, & Hoza, 2001).
    Previous research has indicated that social skill deficits are predictive of later maladjustment.  Namely, the literature has focused on the association between peer rejection and lack of social skills with externalizing outcomes such as rule breaking behavior, hostility, delinquency, and aggression (Bagwell, Molina, Pelham, & Hoza, 2001).  Hymel, Rubin, Rowden, and LeMare (1990) conducted a longitudinal study to investigate whether social skill deficits would predict externalizing and internalizing problems three years later.  Prior to this investigation, virtually no studies examined internalizing difficulties such as anxiety, depression, and withdrawn behaviors.  The hypothesis of this study was that children who are rejected by peers would recognize their peer status and as a result internalizing problems would become present.  The findings of this study were consistent with previous research; that is, a link was found between peer rejection and externalizing difficulties such as aggression.  In addition, peers significantly related internalizing problems to early social difficulties, particularly social isolation, social incompetence, and poor acceptance.  The current study is an investigation of both internalizing disorders such as anxiety and depression as well as externalizing disorders such as rule breaking and attentional problems.  Thus social difficulties may be a risk factor in development.  Fortunately, there are methods to assist children with low social competence.
    Remediation for children with low social competence has come in the form of individual counseling, psychotropic medications or, more recently, social skills training (SST).  Social skills are overt nonverbal (e.g., eye contact) and verbal (e.g., introducing yourself) interpersonal skills that maximize social engagement.  They are socially accepted, learned behaviors that enable one to interact with others in ways that elicit positive responses, avoid negative responses and serve as the basis for social competence (Hops, 1983).  According to Gresham (2004), who reviewed six meta-analyses, social skills training (SST) programs have a 64% improvement rate.  Gresham (2004) noted,  however, that, for the most part, SST programs are prototypical commercial programs that do not assess participants prior to treatment.  The current study sought to evaluate the treatment effects of a novel SST program that incorporated information gathered from a pre-treatment evaluation.  In addition, in contrast to other SST outcome studies, the current study sought to evaluate the relationship between pre-treatment psychological adjustment and post-treatment psychological adjustment with both internalizing and externalizing functioning.  In contrast to other studies, the current study examined pre and post parent ratings of specific social skills.  Additionally, the current investigation examined overall functioning through parent and child responses before and after treatment.  The study also examined pre and posttests on nonverbal cues of participants.  Lastly, the study examined satisfaction of the SST program and how well the program met the needs for the individual children.

back to top

Social Skills Comorbidity
    In the current study nine of twelve children (75%) possess another disability.  Which, according to the literature, may put children at risk for greater social skills difficulties.  The literature suggests that children with learning disabilities, both verbal and nonverbal are at a greater risk for social skills deficits (Kavale & Forness, 1996).  Additionally Kavale and Forness (1996) found evidence for the trimorbidity hypothesis, that is a relationship among social deficits, learning disabilities, and psychiatric conditions (such as depression).  The current study employs this suggestion of assessment of psychiatric conditions, specifically examining depression and anxiety, as well as examing attentional difficulties.
    In addition to learning disabilities, children with ADHD are at a higher risk for a number of social deficits and have difficulty interpreting their own social abilities (Deiner & Milich, 1997).  Difficulties children with ADHD have with their peers are often such profound problems that investigators have argued that the phenomena of disturbed peer relations itself should be a defining characteristic of the disorder (Landau & Moore, 1991).  ADHD is frequently comorbid with other disorders including mood and anxiety disorders.  Co-occurring psychiatric conditions are believed to range from 9% to one-third of children with ADHD in a primary care setting.  Within a referred population, the prevalence of comorbidity is about 33% (Brown & LaRosa, 2002).  As we have seen, SST evaluations rarely account for comorbidity as an important criterion variable.  Constructs of anxiety and depression are important and research by Segrin (2000) and Karutis, Power, Rescorla, Eiraldi, and Gallagher (2000) have shown there is a correlation between these constructs and social skills.
    Unfortunately, poor social skills are often comorbid with ADHD, LDs, depression, and anxiety.  SST programs seek to provide children with social skills that will serve as a buffer against other difficulties they may face.  If a child possesses social skills and social competence, the hope is that psychiatric problems, attention problems, and academic problems will decrease.  Thus, one of the objectives of current study is to determine if social skills training will have an impact on anxiety and depression.  Based on Segrin (2000) and Karutis et al. (2000)’s findings, the hypothesis of the current study states that SST will have an effect on changing children’s levels of depression and anxiety if the social skills treatment is effective.

back to top

Social Skills Training
    SST can utilize operant, social learning, and cognitive-behavioral approaches as well as a combination of the approaches.  Operant learning procedures focus on overt, observable behavior.  The current SST program under investigation focuses on overt observable behaviors.  The SST program teaches the kids both verbal and nonverbal behaviors.  Included in observable verbal behaviors include introducing oneself, starting a conversation, asking relevant questions to show one is listening, ending a conversation, calling a friend, complimenting, and being assertive.  The SST program also includes nonverbal observable behaviors such as eye contact and posture.
     Operant intervention is at work when SST instructors give children the opportunity to work together.  The current study allows the SST group to form their own identity by establishing a team name, competing with other SST teams, and are given free time to work and play together.  Thus, the environment allows the children to practice the skills.  In the current study, the SST intervention relies heavily upon operant learning principles of positive reinforcement and constructive feedback (rather then punishment) to shape behavior.  In SST both instructors and children are capable of being models.  In the SST under investigation, peers and coaches become models and the entire group is encouraged to give feedback to one another.
     Problem behaviors may affect social difficulties, yet for the most part social difficulties can stem from performance deficits, not being able to implement the social skills, or skill deficit, that is not recognizing or knowing the skill (Gresham, 2004). Due to the nature and complexity of social difficulties, there is the notion that perhaps it is best not to apply standardized SST programs.  In all likelihood, individual children vary in the degree to which skill remediation or performance motivation will be helpful. Therefore, SST must emphasize the need for tailoring intervention to fit the individual (Pfiffner, Calzada, & McBurnett, 2000).  Most SST programs do not tailor fit the individual; rather, a one-size fits all approach is used.  As Gresham (2004) vividly illustrates the prototypical SST programs “round up the usual suspects” and put them in a social skills group and teach them behaviors whether they need it or not.
       The current study evaluates children in an in-depth assessment prior to treatment.  In addition, participants are matched according to their needs with similar peers.  SST groups are not established unless the group members are similar in their social deficits, strengths, age, and general intellectual functioning.  The efficacy of SST programs are equivocal.  One begins to wonder if the equivocal results are caused by the universal assumption that all children benefit from the same intervention.
      Despite some initially reported positive outcomes (Kendall & Braswell, 1982) some researchers believe SST programs have failed to demonstrate efficacy in remediating social skills deficits in children with ADHD (Abikoff, 1985).  However, the most recent article to date (Gresham, 2004) reviewed six meta-analyses of social skills training with over 25,000 children between the ages of 3 and 18.  The internal validity of the meta-analyses reveals that there is a 64% improvement rate relative to controls using the binomial effect size display.  The 64% success of SST is significant because it is almost identical to the meta-analytic findings of the effects of psychotherapy with children and adolescents.  the external validity of Gresham’s large meta-analysis demonstrated that SST is effective across a broad range of behavioral difficulties including aggression, externalizing behaviors, internalizing behaviors, and antisocial behavior.
     The objective of the current study is to examine if there is a change in overall functioning for children participating in SST programs.  The external validity of Gresham’s large meta-analysis demonstrated that SST is effective across a broad range of behavioral difficulties including aggression, externalizing behaviors, internalizing behaviors, and antisocial behavior.  It is predicted that this finding in the large meta-analysis will occur in the current study.
back to top


    Participants were drawn from a series of children receiving SST at a private practice.  Twelve children (7 girls, 5 boys) aged 8-16 (mean age=12.42, SD=2.50), and their parents completed questionnaires.  Seven children declined to participate in the study.  The children and parents who agreed to participate were Caucasian middle class (83%)with the exception of one parent and child of Indian (8.3%)and one parent and child of Asian background (8.3%).  Half (n= 6) of the children in the current study have been diagnosed with ADHD.  Thirty-three percent (n=4) on the children had been diagnosed with LD;  sixteen percent (n=2) with a nonverbal learning disability and sixteen percent (n=2) with a verbal learning disability.  Twenty five percent (n=3) possess traits of Aspergers. Participants were given the opportunity for free twenty-minute feedback sessions with a clinical psychologist for completing post paperwork.  Eleven sent the questionnaires back in the mail (57.9%), eight parents came into the office for feedback (42.1%) and seven parents and children declined to participate (36.8%).
back to top

Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL; Achenbach, 1991) see Appendix A
The Youth Self-Report (YSR; Achenbach, 1991)  see Appendix B
Child Depression Inventory (CDI; Kovacs, 1992)  see Appendix C
Multidimensional Anxiety Scale for Children (MASC; March, 1998) see Appendix D
Questionnaire  see Appendix E

As part of an administered screening, participant’s mood and behavior were evaluated.  Participants then engaged in a four-day intensive social skills workshop with approximately four other peers.  Patients were then given a cover letter describing the research (see Appendix F).   With signed informed consent (see Appendix G), participants were able to mail in posttest surveys.  Participants were given free twenty-minute feedback from a licensed clinical psychologist on their child’s progress in SST intervention.  Parents were sent a final reminder in the mail (see Appendix H ) that this was the last opportunity to participate in the study and detailing when the last open office hours were available.  The Institutional Review Board and the American Psychological Association Code of Ethics have approved this study.
back to top

Treatment Content
SST Intervention
     Children received three-hour sessions consecutively for four days during the summer of 2004.  There were five small groups in SST.   The same two therapists taught sessions for the small groups for a week.  One therapist is an undergraduate, one has a bachelor’s, one has a master’s, and one is a licensed doctoral level psychologist.  The therapists engaged in training to ensure standardization.  The leaders taught skill modules using didactic instruction, in vivo modeling, role-playing, rehearsal, and feedback.
    Each skill was presented to the group through didactic styles.  Leaders then reviewed how, when, where, and why to use the skill with peers.  Leaders modeled the skill extensively and children then role played the positive use of the skill with another child in the group. Children were then provided with both positive and constructve feedback from leaders and peers. Typically four to five skills were taught to the group in a day and were reinforced throughout all sessions.  Two weeks after the sessions, parents were invited to a meeting to review how to generalize the specific skills at home and in school settings.
back to top


    In comparison to reports on pre-treatment questionnaires, on post-treatment questionnaires, the children rated themselves as significantly less anxious (t(6)=4.26, p<.05), less on the anxiety disorder subscale(t (4)=3.23, p<.05), less withdrawn (t (6)=2.63, p<.05), less aggressive (t(6) = 3.10, p<.05), possessing fewer social problems (t (6)= 2.90 , p<.05), less externalizing (behavior) problems (t(6)= 4.733, p<.05), and having fewer total problems (t(6)=3.121, p<.05).  Ratings by parents followed a similar pattern with parents rating their children as significantly less withdrawn (t (10)= 2.85, p<. 05), having fewer internalizing symptoms (t (10)= 2.79, p<.05), and having a marginally significant improvement in externalizing symptoms (t (10)= 2.18, p= .055).
     The change from pre to post measurement for all the subscales of the Children’s Depression Inventory, Multidimensional Anxiety Scale, Youth Self Report, and Child Behavior Checklist was in the predicted direction.  The means for all subscales were lower on post measures, although not significant.
     The parents reported an increase in their child’s use of social skills as compared to before the program with both friends and parents.  Parents reported that their children need reminders and support to implement social skills.  This questionnaire also examined generalization; 83.4% of parents reported “somewhat”, “most”, or “full” generalization of the program.  Seventy-five percent of parents noticed “somewhat”, “most”, or “full”improvement in their child’s relationships. Eighty three percent of parents said they were “mostly” or “fully” satisfied with the social skills program.  Ninety one percent of parents reported that the program “somewhat”, “mostly”, or “fully” met their personal goals for their child.
back to top


    The literature identifies a relationship between social skills and psychiatric factors (Kavale & Forness, 1996;Segrin, 2000; Karutis et al. 2000).The stated hypothesis for the current investigation was that acquisition of social skills in this SST program would result in decreased symptoms of anxiety and depression.  Results of this preliminary study suggest that SST did have a positive effect on the psychological adjustment of children with low social competence.Specifically, these internalizing behaviors (anxiety and depression) were significantly decreased on posttest measures rated by both the children and parents.
    Both children and parents reported significant differences in withdrawn behaviors on posttest measures following participation in SST.  This is an important finding in current study because not only did the children report feeling significantly less withdrawn the parents reported identical findings. Being less withdrawn enables children to try out new things, engage in novel social interactions, and affords them the opportunity to use their new social skills.Being less withdrawn is a positive sign that children may be ready to use their new social skills and build new friendships.
    In addition to internalizing problems (anxiety and depression), Gresham’s large meta-analysis (2004) supported the external validity of SST as effective across a broad range of behavioral difficulties including aggression, externalizing behaviors, and antisocial behavior.  It was predicted the current study would replicate these findings.  The current study did support this hypothesis with parent responses on the CBCL significantlyindicating children were less withdrawn, had fewer internalizing symptoms (depression and anxiety), and having a marginally significant improvement in externalizing symptoms (rule breaking behavior, attention problems) from posttest to pretest. The children rated themselves as significantly less anxious, less withdrawn, and less aggressive, and as having fewer total problems.It is important that future research continue to investigate and support the external validity of SST programs.If internalizing, externalizing, and total problems are decreased as a result of participation in SST, children are more likely to make and maintain friendships, a factor that is associated with positive long-term consequences.
    The significant positive results of this pilot study are encouraging.  The study reported significant decrease of internalizing, externalizing, and total problems as reported from both children and parents.  Parents also reported satisfaction with the program and that the program did in fact tailor to fit the individual child; specificically, 91% of parents reported the program “somewhat”, “mostly”, or “fully” me their personal goals for their child.  These results are especially encouraging considering the SST program was only a 12-hour intervention and in light of the fact the children were experiencing much distress prior to SST (marked distress on pretests and comorbidity).
    Methodologically, the length of time between pre and posttest for each individual child varied.  Although, on average, only 2 months passed between pre- and post- measurement, the effects of maturation could account for the positive results obtained in this study. The positive results in the study could also be accounted for placebo effect for the children and adults were aware of the purpose of the study and thus could have reported false positive effects. Consent forms and questionnaires were in a packet for the children and parent to complete and mail back to the office.Because these questionnaires were sent home with the parents, there was little control over the environment in which the questionnaires were completed.The current study did not control for such outside influence and thus this is a threat to the internal validity of the current investigation.
    A great strength of this study is that both parent and child questionnaires were administered. Thus, enabling children and parent ratings to be examined independently and examined for corroboration.  However, this required the use of additional questionnaires. Attrition may have minimized if fewer instruments were used.  Yet this would be at the cost of receiving additional and informative data.The attrition of seven children and parents who did not complete posttests measures is also a threat to the internal validity of the study. The attrition affected the sample size.The small sample size did not allow for adequate statistical power; therefore, there may have been differences that were not detected.Shortcomings of this pre-post study include small sample size and lack of a comparison group. Future research should employ a control group of children on a waiting list who do not receive SST treatment.  This group would control for the confounding variables of placebo effects and maturation.
    Although there were limitations in the current study, there is importance in and implications of the results that were found.There are a number of goals for SST programs.The main goal is for children to acquire social competence.A secondary goal of SST, which effectiveness studies often neglect, is for the individual child to improve in psychological adjustment.Very few studies on the effectiveness of SST have examined the degree to which psychological adjustment (or internalizing problems) may change as a result of participation in a SST program as the present study did. Although the direction of the relationship between social skills deficits and psychological adjustment has not yet been established it has been hypothesized in the literature that acquisition of social skills and competence may increase psychological functioning.The current pilot study is important to increasing considerations for psychological variables in the future. If future studies were to continue to support the comobidity of social skills deficits and difficulty with psychological functioning, SST may assist more children in remediation of both social skills deficits and psychological problems.
    An important conclusion can be drawn from this pilot study: some of the suffering these children experience appears to be alleviated.Being significantly less anxious, withdrawn, and posessing fewer internalizing, externalizing and total problems means the child is suffering less. These findings suggest that SST can have positive effects socially and in overall functioning of children.
back to top


Abikoff, H.B. (1985). Efficacy of cognitive training intervention with hyperactive children: A critical review. Clinical Psychology Review, 5, 479-512.

Bagwell, C., Molina, B., Pelham, W.E., & Hoza, B. (2001). Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and problems in peer relations: Predictions from childhood to adolescence. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 40, 1285-1292.   

Brown, R., & LaRosa, A. (2002) Recent developments in the pharmacotherapy of the attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Professional Psychology: Research & Practice, 33

Diener, M.B. & Milich, R. (1997). Effects of positive feedback on the social interactions of boys with attention deficit disorder hyperactivity disorder: A test of the self-protective hypothesis. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 26, 256-265.

Gresham, F. M., Cook, C.R., & Crews, S.D. (2004). Social skills training for children and youth with emotional and behavioral disorders: Validity considerations and future directions. Journal of Behavior Disorders.

Hops, H. (1983). Children’s social competence and skill: Current research practices and future directions. Behavior Therapy, 14, 3-18.

Hymal, S., Rubin, K.H., Rowden, L., & LeMare, L. (1999). Children’s peer relationships: Longitudinal prediction of internalizing and externalizing problems from middle to late childhood. Child Development, 61, 2004-2021.

Karutis,J., Power,T., Rescorla,L. Eiraldi,R. & Gallagher,P. (2000) Anxiety and depression in children with ADHD: Unique associations with academic and social functioning. Journal of Attention Disorders, 4, 133-149.

Kavale, K.A., Forness, S.R. (1996). Social skills deficits and learning disabilities: A meta-analysis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29, 226-237.

Kendall, P.C., & Braswell, L. (1982). Cognitive-behavioral self-control therapy for children: A components analysis. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 50, 672-689.

Landau, S., & Moore, L.A. (1991). Social skills deficits in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. School Psychology Review, 20, 235-251.

Pfiffner, L.J., Calzada, E., & McBurnett, K. (2000). Interventions to enhance social competence, Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 9, 689-709.

Segrin, C. (2000). Social skills deficits associated with depression, Clinical Psychology Review, 20, 379-403.
back to top


Appendix A & Appendix B
Sample Items from Child Behavior Checklist & Youth Self-Report (CBCL &YSR; Achenbach, 1991)
Completed by parents (CBCL) and by children (YSR);
yield internalizing, externalizing, and total problem scales
(sample items are together because the majority of questions are identical wth same scale)

Subscale                                0 = not true    1 = sometimes true    2 = very true
1. Anxious/ Depressed        
Ex. Feels he or she has to be perfect
2. Withdrawn
Ex. Would rather be alone than with others
back to top

Appendix C
Sample Items from Children’s Depression Inventory (CDI; Kovacs, 1992)              
Higher score indicates higher level of depression.

Subscale                                Score
1. Negative Mood
I am sad once in awhile.           0
I am sad many times.               1
I am sad all the time.                2
back to top

Appendix D
Sample Items from Multidimensional Anxiety Scale for Children (MASC; March, 1998)
                            Higher score indicates higher level of anxiety.                                                        

Subscale         0=never true       1=rarely true          2=sometimes true          3=often true
1. Physical Symptoms
      Ex. My heart races or skips beats
back to top

Appendix E

1. How often did your child use positive social skills before entering the social skills program?
never            rarely            occasionally            sometimes            often           
2. How often does your child use social skills appropriately now?
never            rarely            occasionally            sometimes            often           
3.  Have you observed an increase in your child's positive social behavior
with friends?
never            rarely            occasionally            sometimes            often          
with parents?
never            rarely            occasionally            sometimes            often                                               
with siblings?                                                                                                                                     never            rarely            occasionally            sometimes            often           
4.  Does your child require support or reminders to implement social skills?
never            rarely            occasionally            sometimes            often           
5. In your opinion, does your child have more difficulty with                                                           
a.  not knowing the skill                                                                                                                   
b.  not being able to use the skill                                                                                   
d.  not sure
6. Do you believe this program not only taught skills but also taught your child when to use the skills outside of group?
not at all        a little          somewhat           mostly                    fully
7. Have you noticed an improvement in your child's ability to establish and/or maintain relationships with peers?
not at all        a little          somewhat           mostly                     fully
8. Describe your overall satisfaction with the program:
not at all        a little          somewhat           mostly                     fully
9. To what extent did the program meet your personal goals for your child?
not at all        a little          somewhat        mostly                      fully
back to top

Appendix F
Cover Letter handed to parents upon child’s completion of SST

Dear Parent or Guardian:

We are writing to you because we are conducting a research study to evaluate the effectiveness of the summer Social Skills Program your child recently completed.  During your initial assessment with Dr. Monarch you completed paperwork.  Now we would like to compare your responses on the pre-program paperwork with similar post-program questionnaires.  To accomplish this, we have enclosed sets of post program questionnaires for you to fill out.  Please take the time to complete the paperwork and send it back to us in our enclosed self-addressed, stamped envelope.  Your responses will help us evaluate the effectiveness of social skills training in general as well as your satisfaction with our program.  Your responses will also help other parents decide whether social skills training is worthwhile.  It is important for you to know your participation is entirely voluntary. 

When this research study is completed, it may be published in a medical journal; however, all of your responses will remain confidential.  The principal investigator on this research project is Meghan Dwyer.  She will use portions of this data for her Senior Research Thesis at Saint Anselm College.  Again, all information about your child will remain confidential.  The overall results of this study (when completed) will be available to you upon request. 

In exchange for your time, we are offering parents who participate in this study a (optional) 20-minute feedback-session about your child’s progress free of charge.  During this time, you will be able to talk with Dr. Monarch about anything related to your child’s class and social development.  While you meet with Dr. Monarch, your child will complete a brief test of nonverbal communication and two brief questionnaires.  Again, the testing and meeting with Dr. Monarch will be entirely free of charge.

We hope you choose to participate in this research study. 
1. The first step is to complete the paperwork; then mail the paperwork to us in the enclosed self-addressed, stamped envelope as soon as possible.
2. The second (optional) step is to bring your child to a feedback session where he or she will complete a couple tests and we will discuss these results with you. 

Saturday August 21st      10:00-2:00
Saturday August 18th     10:00-2:00
You may arrive at the office anytime during these hours.

If you are unable to attend these times and are interested in participating in the study and receiving free feedback from Dr. Monarch, please call (401) 351-3733.

This is the final phase of Meghan’s data collection for her thesis.  Therefore, if you are willing to participate it is important to complete the paperwork promptly.

We look forward to receiving your feedback on the questionnaires.  Thank you!

Meghan Dwyer                Elena Monarch, Ph. D.
Social Skills Instructor      Licensed Clinical Psychologist

back to top

Appendix G
Consent Form

The person responsible for the research is:    
   Meghan Dwyer                Email:
The goal of the research:
    The main goal is to determine whether this social skills training program improves your child’s social effectiveness and enhances his or her positive peer contact.  We are also interested in assessing whether our program influences anxiety, depression, self-esteem, and nonverbal communication skills.

The following procedure will occur:
   Measures will be re-administered on the last day of class to evaluate effectiveness of the program.     Four weeks following treatment, you may complete surveys at your convenience at home.  It will take you less than an hour to complete this paperwork.

Description of risks or discomforts:
   As part of a clinical outcome study, risks and benefits of this research project are equivalent to social skills intervention.

Description of confidentiality of the data:
  All files will be confidential.  All participants will be referred to by a participant number and not identified by name.  All files will remain in a locked filing cabinet.

Head of Campus Review Board:
  Professor Joseph R. Troisi            Email:

Consent Statement:
  I have read and understand the procedures in the described research project.  I understand that my participation is voluntary, that should I refuse to participate or discontinue at any time there will be no penalty or loss of benefit to which I am otherwise entitled.

Parent or Guardian’s Signature and Printed Name and Date

Child’s Signature and Printed Name

back to top

Appendix H
Reminder Letter, sent to parents

September 18, 2004

Dear Parent or Guardian:

After your child completed the Summer Social Skills program, you received a packet regarding a research study.  This is the final phase of Meghan Dwyer’s data collection for her thesis.  Therefore, if you are willing to participate it is important to complete the paperwork promptly.  If you have misplaced your packet, please leave us a message at 351-3733 and we will be happy to send you a new one.

Your responses on these post-program questionnaires will help us evaluate the effectiveness of social skills training in general as well as your satisfaction with our program.  Your responses will also help other parents decide whether social skills training is worthwhile.  It is important for you to know your participation is entirely voluntary. 

We hope you choose to participate in this research study. 
3. The first step is to complete the paperwork; then mail the paperwork to us in the enclosed self-addressed, stamped envelope as soon as possible.
4. The second (optional) step is to bring your child to a feedback session where he or she will complete a couple tests and we will discuss these results with you. 

Tuesday October 12th  4:30-5:30, 6:45-8:00 pm
Tuesday October 19th  4:30-5:30, 6:45-8:00 pm
You may arrive at the office anytime during these hours.

If you are unable to attend these times and are interested in participating in the study and receiving free feedback from Dr. Monarch, please call (401) 351-3733. 

We look forward to receiving your feedback on the questionnaires.  Thank you!

Meghan Dwyer                Elena Monarch, Ph. D.
Social Skills Instructor      Licensed Clinical Psychologist

back to top

Related Links

Saint Anselm College

Social Skills

Social Skills: Effective Strategies for Student Success

ADHD & Social Skills

Nonverbal LD & Social Skills

For more specific information on this SST program,
please e-mail

back to top