|
|
|
|
|
18
|
22
|
|
|
19
|
5
|
|
|
21
|
1
|
|
|
Total
|
28
|
18.29
|
Table 2. Average Hours of Instant Messenger Use
| N
Valid
Missing |
28
0 |
| Mean |
4.2054
|
| Standard Deviation |
3.6190
|
| Range |
15.75
|
| Minimum |
.25
|
| Maximum |
16.00
|
Table 3. Total Score on the UCLA Loneliness Scale
| N
Valid
Missing |
28
0 |
| Mean |
18.821
|
| Standard Deviation |
5.876
|
| Range |
26
|
| Minimum |
10
|
| Maximum |
36
|
Table 4. Descriptive
Statistics of Average Hours of Use of Instant Messenger and Total Score
on UCLA Loneliness
Scale
|
|
|
|
|
| Hours of Use |
4.2054
|
3.6190
|
28
|
| Total Score |
18.821
|
5.876
|
28
|
Table 5. Correlation of Average Hours of Use of Instant Messenger and Total Score on UCLA Loneliness Scale
|
|
|
|
| Hours of Use Person Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed) Sum of Squares and Cross-Products Covariance N |
1.000
. 353.632
|
.262
.17 150.277
|
| Total Score Person
Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed) Sum of Squares and Cross-Products Covariance N |
.262
.178 150.277
|
1.000
. 932.107
|
Table 6. Descriptive Statistics on Hours of Use, Buddy List, and Question 6 on the UCLA Loneliness Scale
|
|
|
|
|
| T2Q6 |
1.321
|
.612
|
28
|
| Hours of Use |
4.2054
|
3.6190
|
28
|
| Buddy List |
68.0714
|
41.9267
|
28
|
Table 7. Model Summary
of Linear Regression of Hours of Use, Buddy List and Question 6 on the
UCLA Loneliness
Scale
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
.519a
|
.270
|
.211
|
.543
|
Table 8. Linear Regression: ANOVA of Hours of Use, Buddy List and Question 6 on the UCLA Loneliness Scale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 Regression |
2.724
|
2
|
1.362
|
4.613
|
.020a
|
| Residual |
7.383
|
25
|
.295
|
||
| Total |
10.107
|
27
|
Table 9. Descriptive Statistics on Hours of Use, Buddy List, and Question 9 on the UCLA Loneliness Scale
|
|
|
|
|
| T2Q9 |
1.893
|
.832
|
28
|
| Hours of Use |
4.2054
|
3.6190
|
28
|
| Buddy List |
68.0714
|
41.9267
|
28
|
Table 10. Model
Summary of Linear Regression of Hours of Use, Buddy List and Question 9
on the UCLALoneliness
Scale
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
.547a
|
.299
|
.243
|
.724
|
Table 11. Linear Regression: ANOVA of Hours of Use, Buddy List and Question 9 on the UCLA Loneliness Scale
| Model |
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 Regression |
5.579
|
2
|
2.790
|
5.324
|
.012a
|
| Residual |
13.099
|
25
|
.524
|
||
| Total |
18.679
|
27
|
Table 12. Group Statistics of Percentage of Weekend Night Use and Question 9 on the UCLA Loneliness Scale
|
|
|
|
|
|
| T2Q9 Time of use
less than 20%
Time of use
|
16 12 |
1.625
2.250 |
.719 .866 |
.180 .250 |
Table 13. Independent T-Test of Percentage of Weekend Night Use and Question 9 on the UCLA Loneliness Scale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| T2Q9 Equal
variances assumed
Equal
|
.070
|
.793
|
-2.086 -2.030 |
26 21.161 |
.047 .055 |
Table 14. Group Statistics of Percentage of Weekday Night Use and Question 9 on the UCLA Loneliness Scale
|
|
|
|
|
|
| T2Q9 Time of use
less than 20%
Time of use
|
18
10 |
1.667
2.300 |
.840
.675 |
.198
.213 |
Table 15. Independent T-Test of Percentage of Weekday Night Use and Question 9 on the UCLA Loneliness Scale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| T2Q9 Equal
variances assumed
Equal
|
.383
|
.541
|
-2.041 -2.175 |
26 22.383 |
.052 .040 |