Sheri M.Landers
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Instruments:WISC
Intelligence Test for Children, State-Trait
Anxiety Inventory for Children, EAS Temperament Survey, Self-Report
of Shyness, Social Problem-Solving Test
Abstract:
This study looked at the relationship of shyness and anxiety to the Social
Problem-Solving Skills (SPSS) of children. Seven males and seven
females from ages eight to twelve were tested on their nonsocial problem-solving
skills, teacher-rated and self-reported shyness levels, anxiety levels,
and SPSS. It was hypothesized that (1) shyness and anxiety would
be positively correlated, (2) both shyness and anxiety would lead to deficits
in SPSS, (3) anxiety would be positively corelated with nonsocial problem-solving
whereas shyness would not, (4) shyness would still lead to deficts in SPSS
when controlling for anxiety and nonsocial problem-solving, and (5) a significant
difference would exist between automatic and delayed conditions of the
SPSS measure. Overall, results included that shy children were deficient
in SPSS. Results also suggested that these deficits were not due
to anxiety or limited social knowledge as had previously been hypothesized
but to another factor such as trouble coming up with effective soutions
with the quickness required in a real situation. Implications and
limitations of this study as well as directions for future studies are
discussed.
Questions or comments
can be e-mailed to: slanders@anselm.edu